We won the Bennett Award – the annual UUA Congregational Award for Justice!

If you were at the annual meeting, you already heard this great news that this year, our congregation was selected as the 2017 recipient for the UUA Bennett Award for Congregational Action on Human Justice and Social Action.  This award recognizes congregations that has done exemplary social justice ministry.

In the letter from the Bennett Award Panel, they wrote:

“From your congregational vision to ‘Unleash Courageous Love’ to your approach of accompaniment of the most vulnerable in your community, positioning ‘real life, on-the-ground presence’ and service as part of systemic social change, your justice ministry truly deserves this recognition.  It’s inspiring to learn about how your work for justice is driving by your mission and faith, and sustained by spiritual practices from breaking bread and vigiling to storytelling and companioning.”

Read the whole letter here.

This award recognizes the work of all of the many people who make our Faith Family Hospitality, One Village One Family, Food Bank, Immigration Coalition, and Climate Justice ministries happen – and have such a huge and consistent impact on our community.  Thank you to all those who have stepped up in big and small ways, over and over – I hope you take this award as a recognition of just how much these efforts mean.

A special thank you to Kay Williams, Anne Fisher and Sue Ferguson who compiled the application and the ministry leads who each helped tell the story of their areas of our total ministry for justice.



The UUA President, Institutional Racism, Broken Covenants, and Living with Uncertainty

I first met the Rev. Peter Morales when I was a student in my second year of seminary.  We were at a collegial gathering at the church where he was then serving, in Golden, Colorado.  He was quiet, and I left the meeting not knowing all that much about him – or he, me.

Still, as a seminarian and lay leader in Denver, I admired Peter’s ministry in the nearby Jefferson Unitarian Church, and so I eagerly supported his candidacy for UUA President in 2009. My partner and I dropped in at his church for the Sunday where he announced he’d decided to run.  The enthusiasm and hopefulness in that gathering was palpable. He said, he wished that all of the congregations in the UUA could have the vitality of JUC – that the goodness they had together shouldn’t be contained in one small corner of Colorado.  He wanted to lead the whole Association in discovering and embracing what they’d created there.

The first term of Peter’s Presidency was based on this vision, where he repeatedly called on our Association and our congregations to Get Religion, Cross Borders and Grow Leaders.  I found this focus clarifying and relevant to the challenges we were facing, and a strong jumping off point for our work together.  By the time of his second term (which began in 2013), however, this vision had fallen away as the challenges of institution-building and alignment presented themselves, the ups and downs of regionalization and the insufficient funds at a national level ran their course, and the politics of our small UU world played out.  The role of the UUA President often seems to me like the most challenging/frustrating parts of large church ministry put together with the most challenging/frustrating parts of serving our smaller, most change-averse congregations.  By which I mean….it’s a job filled intense pressure, public judgment, resistance to change, suspicion of authority, and polarized thinking – as I said to the three candidates currently running for President – you must be very brave.  The job seems to me, exhausting, and often, disheartening.

I last spent time with Peter at the gathering for UU ministers serving large UU churches in Santa Barbara just a few weeks ago.  He and his wife Phyllis are retiring to the town next to my hometown in Washington state, so we talked about what that life would be like, and what he hoped for.   As he spoke of it, I felt happy for him, seeing that he was looking forward to retirement.  He shared the surreal and heartbreaking experience of needing to issue “a statement a day” on whatever recent immoral act the Trump administration had done – sometimes there were multiple needs in a single day.

I say all this to start because, I think it’s important in these moments to remember what a small community we are, how often what looks like “big politics” is actually a relatively small group of people trying to figure out how to live and be and grow together, and also that there are finally, simply people here.  Flawed, complicated, hopeful people, so wanting our faith to matter, to live into our promise – especially in this cultural moment where so many of our churches are thriving, feeling the call to do the important work of resistance, community-building, and unleashing courageous love.

Yesterday, news broke that Peter resigned his role as President, three months short of the end of his term.  For some who haven’t been following our “small world that masquerades as big politics” in the last few weeks, here are the important facts that immediately preceded his resignation.  (also check out the UU World summary here.)

  1. A few weeks ago, a hire was made in the Southern Region, for Regional Lead.  The person they hired was a white, straight, cisgender male (someone I consider a good colleague, and to whom I send my sympathy and support through this difficult beginning to his new job).
  2. The facts of that hire, however, made the leadership of the UUA wildly and disproportionately white, and male.  For an explicitly anti-racist, anti-oppression organization, this was/is a problem, and a clear symbol of the larger problem of institutional racism that most of us realize is a part of our infrastructure – an infrastructure we have committed to transform.
  3. Through letters that spread quickly online, UU Clergy and other leaders named this problem as a systemic issue that needed to be addressed, grieved the lack of progress this hire signaled, and called us to live up to our stated values.
  4. In response, Peter wrote an open letter and sent it to his staff team across the country (the President is the CEO of the UUA).  That letter, for the most part, did not  – as he surely hoped – help the situation, and instead caused even greater division.  In particular, some among us responded to his defensiveness and his use of the term “hysteria,” which has a particular cultural connotation and history – i.e. that the concerns were being blown out of proportion.
  5. It was in response to this division, that Peter resigned.

We will be electing a new President in June, so ultimately the practical impact of his resignation will be pretty short-lived.  But it is the less-immediate, perhaps less-practical impact that I believe is worthy of our reflection and consideration.

To begin: are we institutionally racist and is our system built to perpetuate white culture and supremacy? Of course.  Though we have tried, are trying, keep trying to do better, we are a part of the wider US culture, not immune to these forces.  We are also institutionally sexist, homophobic, *trans-phobic, classist, ableist – and we swim in all sorts of other isms and phobias.  Generations of Unitarians and Universalists and Unitarian Universalists have perpetuated these systems consciously and unconsciously.  This is true in our wider Association, and it is surely true in our individual congregations – including our own.

It is always surprising to me that this is surprising.  Perhaps it is because we confuse the Unitarian Universalist faith with the Unitarian Universalist Association.  But our faith is not the same thing as the institution of the UUA. The UUA is – to use the great descriptor from Theodore Parker – the transient.  The UUA is a human creation, limited by human imagination, human ego and yes, human sin.  But our faith is not limited, nor transient – but rather calls to us with the vision of what is permanent – that we might serve on behalf of abundant life, for all – serve on behalf of justice and liberty, for all – that we might imagine a world free of racism, sexism, homophobia – a world free of all of these and other interlocking and oppressive forces – and to work towards such a world’s reality.  That we might still journey in covenant together – even when we do not agree, even when our hearts are broken, even when we can’t see our way through.

There is almost always going to be a disconnect between the lofty promises of our faith, and the on-the-ground reality of our congregations, and our Association.  This is what faith means in a covenantal association.  Inherent to a covenant is the awareness that it will be broken.  We will betray one another, and ourselves. The promises are too big, and we are too – human. What covenant asks of us is not to perfectly fulfill our ideals, however – but when things fall apart, to do the hard work of naming what has been broken, what the injury has been, to learn and listen and to try to understand.  And then, ultimately, covenant invites us to restore the relationship in a renewal of promises.  This is what faith means as a Unitarian Universalist.

Which, I guess, is my way of acknowledging, I wish that Peter would’ve been able to hang in a little longer. I wish he would’ve been able to model how we can and will mess up – even publicly – and yet the broken promise need not be the end of the story.  What’s more, his leaving indicates that somehow he was singularly or supremely responsible for this broken covenant – but surely that is not the case.  We are all a part of bringing us to this moment, and we all need to look at our own selves, and our own assumptions and privileges, and do our own work – that we might all keep attempting to bring our vision and our reality just that much closer to alignment.

But, he wasn’t able to hang in.  For reasons only he knows, he decided to step back.  And so we’re left with a feeling of uncertainty – and quite a bit of confusion as UUs across the country who haven’t been paying attention to the “inside baseball” details that led up to this try to make sense of why the UUA President resigned.

What I’ve learned from the past few months and our congregation’s experience of responding to brokenness and uncertainty, is that people are going to have all sorts of feelings – and we aren’t going to agree about how we can or should respond to this moment, or the ones that come next, or the ones after that.

And yet, as Rilke says, “no feeling is final.”  The important thing is that we make space for all our feelings, and try not to resolve anything too quickly, or try to make everything seem all better when it isn’t, or to try to make agreement where there is none.  It is so much harder to live into the words we say so often than we realize:  that we need not think alike to love alike. Or in Ballou’s version, if we agree in love, then no disagreement can do us any injury – but if we do not, then no agreement can do us any good.

The love that Ballou is describing – the love we are called to “agree in” – is that greater love, that courageous transcendent love – the agape love that fuels and binds our covenant, and that calls us on.  This love – however – becomes really hard to access when we’re anxious, when we’re uncertain, when we’re shocked – and when we wonder if the gap between what we long for and what we are will ever lessen.

So our task ahead, as an Association, and as Unitarian Universalists, remains a spiritual one. The challenge is to stay connected to this deeper love, this grounding and animating force that holds us, still.  And it is to resist the urge to make everything all better and all right too quickly (what theologically we might call, cheap grace) – and instead use this time of uncertainty and the questions that have been raised as a great learning opportunity for how we could be even more who we say we are, that we could build the skills we’re going to need to do the really hard and deep work our faith truly calls us to do.  To seek justice, love mercy, and travel humbly – with one another, with this faith, with courageous love, still urging us on.

Agreeing in Love - Devotionals 2.20.17 (2).png

Highlights from General Assembly from Foothills Delegates

Five Foothills members – in addition to our current and future ministerial team Rev. Gretchen Haley, Diana McLean, and Sean Neil-Barron, attended the UU General Assembly (GA) in Columbus, Ohio, the last week of June.  It was, as always a powerful and somewhat overwhelming experience of learning, encouraging and clarifying all who gathered in our faith, values, and sense of purpose.

One of our delegates, Erin Hottenstein, shared her highlights from GA in her reflection last week.  This week, we invited the other four delegates to share their one big take-away from their GA experience.  Here’s what they had to say:

  1.  The powerful Sunday Morning Worship experience.

Judy Ohs writes, “I looked forward to Sunday morning at GA, remembering the last time I attended it was a very moving service, and I was not disappointed.

Glen Thomas Rideout was in charge of the music and choir, which was awesome.  He also read a poem he had written about the anture of God, saying god is waiting to be unshrunk!

Nancy McDonald Ladd gave a sermon, ‘In All Thy Getting, Get Understanding,’ with as much energy, humor and meaningful challenge as any I have ever heard.  She admonished us to ‘STOP having FALSE FIGHTS’ in our congregations – those fights about insignificant things like ‘the color of the paint for the bathroom,’ and instead get out in the mainstream of our lives, resisting things harmful to ourselves and others, and promoting the things needed for just living for all.  She said when we don’t get our way, we are ‘lovers of leaving’ (referencing the hymn, Come, Come, who ever you are), and that we need to put our personal preferences aside, and instead have the real and hard conversations with each other.  Only this will allow us to create real change, rather than becoming thoroughly agitated, but fundamentally unchanged.  She ended by saying that we need to ‘step more fully into encounters with the holy and the world,’ and in doing so we can love more and speak more.  We can reach out to someone whose hand is near to find support and keep it real.  The service ended with us all singing ‘Reach out and Touch Somebody’s Hand.’

It is my sincere hope that each of you will take the time to watch this service (video posted above).  It will lift your spirit and challenge your soul, and perhaps help you move out into the world to help create the change we need.”

Lindsay Smith added: “I have one request of our Foothills family: please watch the Sunday service. I found it deeply moving and hope we can use it as a common point of reference going forward.”

        2.  The welcome for young adults.


Lindsay Smith writes: “As a first-time delegate to General Assembly, I appreciated the Planning Committee’s dedication to creating a welcoming space for young adults. Not only did the UUA set aside resources to help young adults get to GA, but supported us the whole week. We had dedicated staff and seating blocked off in the large general sessions. We even had ‘General Session Bingo’ to keep things interesting.

Many times I went back to the helpful guide on young adult programming in our (jam-packed!) schedule. I attended workshops on topics from interfaith work to the role of spirituality in mental health. I was happy to see many folks of other generations participating with us, too.

I was overjoyed to represent our congregation in the banner parade alongside my partner Nick. I felt proud to represent our Foothills community and loved seeing Rev. Gretchen, our president Erin, our new minister Sean, and many others cheering for us as we sang through the aisles.

Then, it was time to get down to business. The overarching theme of this year’s GA was racial justice. Youth and young adult UUs of color inspired me by sharing their deeply personal stories. They called us to immediate action with strength, courage, and love. Workshops on anti-racism helped start some of the uncomfortable but necessary conversations that need to take place among UUs and in the wider community.

GA left me inspired to connect with UUs both inside our home church and beyond. It was great to compare notes with delegates from churches across the country.

         3. The Choir 


Nick Marconi writes, ‘Choir is a decision.’ These are the words with which Dr. Glen Rideout opened each rehearsal at GA, offering various reflections on the notion. Choir is a setting aside of time to come together and join in fellowship and purpose. Choir is the realization of the idea that we are stronger and more capable working in harmony—the embodiment of the mantra, “I put my hand in yours so that we may do together what we cannot do alone.” Choir is no mere blending of voices; it is a congregation, and it is deliberate.

In a week where very little else seemed deliberate, 180 of us dedicated ourselves to bringing the Sunday worship services to life. For me, it wasn’t the size of the choir or the audience that brought great meaning; 180 celebrants performing for a crowd of 3,000 is neither the largest ensemble nor audience I’ve experienced—even in Columbus itself, a city I had called home for many years. The real meaning came from the unity of purpose in a room that had lacked it over the course of several painful general sessions. The morning service brought renewed focus to disparate hearts. The afternoon service with Rev. Sekou and The Holy Ghost granted catharsis for those of us who have become all-too- frustrated not only with the prevailing tragedies of the world, but also with the perennial failures of conscience emerging from GA.

I cannot understand how we as a movement fail time and again to make meaningful solidarity with oppressed peoples. I cannot fathom the denominational cognitive dissonance it takes to be so moved by the reminder of our continual need to improve our relationships with minority communities and speak hard truths to those we call allies yet shirk away when called to take action. I pity what Rev. Dr. Susan Ritchie calls our institutional addiction to dysfunctional process that truly impairs our ability to live up to our best vision of ourselves.

I have little, if any, control over the course of global events or the UUA. But just as I had in GA, I can still choose to share music in my small part of the world. Choir is a decision, and I will always make that decision.”

4.  Commitments for Social Witness

Shirley White writes, “CSWAIWCS/AI  Huh?  I put my volunteer efforts at GA here, hoping it would give me knowledge I could share back home. Indeed, it did! Wanting to support this important work of our denomination, still I had to keep refreshing myself on what all those letters mean. They mean a lot! They imply work too important to be buried in acronyms and jargon.So let me translate….

Commission on Social Witness (CSW) supports our efforts to do our social justice work focused each year by choices made at GA, to concentrate our efforts on work that we are best, perhaps uniquely, poised to do in our troubled world.

Congregational Study/Action Issues (CS/AI) are selected by UU member congregations for four years of study, reflection and action. This year, delegates picked our next four-year Congregational Study/Action Issue to beCorruption of Our Democracy.”

Actions of Immediate Witness (AIWs) are issues deemed too immediate and important to go through a four year process. The Commissioners narrowed 8 completed proposals to 3, which the GA delegates passed overwhelmingly.

  1. expressing solidarity with Muslims,
  2. advocating gun reform following the Pulse nightclub massacre,
  3. affirming support for transgender people.

All will be further developed and highlighted in UU World.

We, at Foothills, do a lot of very important work. We might even be a standard bearer in the denomination. We could be more fully bringing our light to UUA/GA, by defining and proclaiming our commitment, particularly by sharing our successful collaboration with other communities and organizations in Fort Collins. Among others, we excel in programs of community collaboration in Faith Family Hospitality, One Village One Family, and  our ministerial leadership in vigils and actions of solidarity with our minority communities in times of stress and trauma visited upon them in our troubled times.

We have light to offer, as well as the opportunity to bask in the healing light that our denomination shines on the world’s pain. By engaging with the UUA, we can do more, especially by learning and engaging with social witness statement process we may accomplish more, and even be prepared to bring more of Foothills light to GA in New Orleans, 2017.

Board Updates – Leadership Workshop & Pledge Drive

Spring is here and with that a lot of good work is being done at Foothills.

We hope you’ll join us this Sunday at 12:30 for our Congregational Forum where we will be providing an update on the Governance Task Force, the Mission Task Force, and some financial updates.  Bring your questions and your feedback, and as always, we thank you for your partnership and for our walking together in this important work.

This past Saturday, Foothills hosted a gathering of of senior lay leaders from UU congregations all across the area – we had representatives from congregations from Littleton to Casper, with over 40 total participants! It was led by the Rev. Nancy Bowen, Regional Lead for the Pacific Western Region of the Unitarian Universalist Association.


This gathering focused on the leadership of the Board of Trustees, the Nominating/Leadership Development Committee, and the Committee on Ministry.  We spoke about what partnership and alignment looks like among a these leadership teams, and how being aligned doesn’t mean doing the same work, but that we are working towards the same thing, same mission.

12924412_1067181093338607_5450508639949069289_nSome of my favorite take a-ways from the day were:

  • How a congregation can grow quickly while successfully protecting human connection.
  • How to find and prepare new leadership
  • The tensions that arise in governance/organizational structure shifts – specifically the ways that as these transitions occur, the organization becomes temporarily centralized in order to establish the new systems, and then as these systems take hold, the organization “exhales” into a less centralized structure.  We spoke a lot about these sorts of polarities, and the need to keep a healthy balance.
  • How we need to strive to be like-hearted instead of like-minded – can we be curious rather than judgmental in our differences?
  • The key leadership practices that demonstrate a covenantal partnership
  • We watched the video from Simon Sinek in his TED talk about the Why, How and What….and how this idea translates inside our congregations – how we too need to start with why.  (This was a perfect set up for the meeting right after this workshop when we continued our good work on our mission statement!)

It was a rich five hours where we all contributed to one another deepening our understanding of leadership in our faith. Your Board, Nominating Committee, and soon to be a new Committee of shared ministries are excited to put these ideas into practice as we complete this church year, and prepare for our future years.

Speaking of our future years – thank you to all of you who have participated in our stewardship campaign over this past month, and an extra thanks to the many of you who have increased your pledges. Your generosity is inspiring and much needed for us to fulfill the very good work of this church. Thank you very much.

As members, we are responsible for our church. Our operating budget is funded almost completely from pledges. This coming year we are paying for 12% increase to our staff’s healthcare, 2 full time ministers, hoping to move Ryan to full time, paying our staff fair compensation per the UUA, as well as pay a living wage.

I ask of my fellow members who have yet to pledge this year to please do so as soon as you can. Your pledges allow us to finalize our budget for the coming year, which we will then present to you all at our annual congregational meeting on June 5th.  When we each participate in the most generous and responsible way we can, we are able to continue the good work we are here to do, and fulfill our mission of making a transformative impact on the world around us.


Reporting in From General Assembly – Our 3 Take-Aways!

Foothlls at GA 2015Last week, a delegation of 14 Foothills members joined in for some or all of the 2015 UUA General Assembly in Portland Oregon.  This annual gathering of over 5,000 representatives from Unitarian Universalist congregations across the US includes worship, learning workshops, lectures, reports, and the business of the association (think: giant congregational meeting) – plus the often-best-part of connecting with UUs from across the country in informal ways over the course of 4 full days.

It was a wonderful General Assembly in the great city of Portland, and we hope to offer the congregation lots of ways to hear back from us about our take-aways.  However, to get us started, I asked everyone to send in their “top 3” things off the top of their head that they felt everyone should know based on their experiences.  So, we’ll start here with that list and then look for more in-depth info coming soon.  Most of the general parts of GA are captured on streaming video, so if you’re anxious to learn more sooner than that – go to UUA.org and search for General Assembly.

GA Banner 2015In no particular order, our assembled TOP 3 Take-Aways!

  1. From a graceful presentation by UU Buddhists comes the idea that when a contentious debate becomes too heated, ask the group for a couple of minutes of silence and then to join the dialogue in a more loving manner. This was practiced by the GA moderator in the final general session.
  2. The worship services were moving and restorative – especially the International Worship Service, with participation from several countries, and wonderful music; but also the CLF worship service and the Sunday morning worship service with the GA choir and a moving sermon.
  3. It was joyful to meet UUs from around the country and around the world.
  4. From a workshop on “Building Contemplative Practices”: Carrying the sacred into everything we do, bring a spirit of contemplation to our every day actions. “bring spirit to the work and make it holy.”
  5. Many rich, diverse sources of practices, music (Taize chanting, Sufi Zikur chants, Kirtan, Buddhist, Kundalini, Muslim chants) and collaboration for our Services(especially Vespers!).
  6. From a workshop on Non-Violent Communication (source:Marshal Rosenberg):
    1. All actions arise from (a beautiful) need
    2. When in conflict
      • Pause – Get yourself under control
      • Connect to your unmet needs(empathy for self)
      • Connect to the unmet needs of the other(empathy for other)
      • Seek solutions grounded in empathy
  7. From workshop on “branding” (speaking of millenials): people join a cause, not a club.
  8. From Kathleen Dean Moore – philosopher and author: A moral problem calls for a moral response and the church is an institution of moral affirmation. Our work is to set the moral context – we have an obligation to protect the earth and climate change is a failure of reverence, a betrayal of our children and an issue of justice (the poor of the earth are disproportionately affected adversely by the excesses of the richer).
  9. People I met have a positive impression of Foothills.  In particular, our work with small groups and Share the Plate projects – I think we will be seen as a resource.
  10. Building relationships and respect at the intersections of cultures: As we engage partners in the wider community, how do we advance our values of multicultural growth and witness in social justice work with those who may differ with us on important issues? After attending a fascinating multiculturalism workshop at GA in Portland, where we learned tools for advancing equality, I was having breakfast in a small logging and sawmill town café when news broke on Fox News of the marriage equality SCOTUS decision. I was struck by the irony of the situation when our pleasant meeting of strangers evolved into some tension as TV coverage sucked up the oxygen in the café, as contrasted with the jubilation I imagined among UUs in the Oregon Convention Center. The lesson and challenge for me is to keep trying, learning and exercising leadership to further our love and values in activities such as One Village One Family and Faith Family Hospitality with people of different faith traditions and values. Or just enjoying the experiences engaging with folks over breakfast at the local café. We can help “Get to Yes” with our shared interests and community partners, even when we have trouble agreeing on every important issue.
  11. From Alison Miller’s powerful sermon in the Sunday morning worship:  the stories we tell matter – they shape our vision of ourselves and how we feel hopeful or hopeless.  With any set of “facts”, we have a choice in how we construct that story and tell it to give the “story” its power.
  12. From the Berry Street Lecture by Sean Dennison, this question: “For whom does your heart break?”
  13. From a workshop on “Talking the Walk: Speaking Justice in the Language of our Faith”–the idea that we don’t check our reason at the door when we enter church, but we often check our spirituality at the door on our way out into the world (especially when we engage in social justice work). The workshop leaders then took us through an exercise to help us reframe our social justice commitments in language tied explicitly to our Unitarian Universalist faith.
  14. 150627_cornel_westFrom the Ware Lecture by Cornel West, the four questions from W.E.B. DuBois at the heart of the lecture” How shall integrity face oppression? What does honesty do in the face of deception? What does decency do in the face of insult? How does virtue meet brute force?
  15. From a workshop on “Habits of Humility and congregational teams as learning communities” –  A culture of humility is a culture where no one is the expert. There are 3 viruses that show up in our congregation:  1. Scoring – someone tries to be the smartest in the room; 2. Sneering – sarastic comments about others who “don’t get it”; and 3. Shaming – directly calling out people who “don’t get it.”
  16. From the same workshop – spiritual strength in the congregation – Have a commitment to learn together.This requires: Willingness to be vulnerable and a covenant to hold that tend space; trust in leaders, curiosity, openness to what is unseen an unknown, engagement with difference, and resilience.  While learning as a community we hear how other people learn new topics, everyone is a learner and a teacher, and we are multi-generational.
  17. From a workshop on “Leaderly leadership – Accountable Leadership” – The session was most powerful when Marlin Lavanhar spoke (also reference everything he shared in his Thursday Service of the Living Tradition sermon).  He shared that intentionality is what we do – who we put on our board, how we advertise, where we advertise – why are we doing this, is this the right person at the table? We need to increase people’s ability to sit with discomfort, while always making sure they will be beloved and safe, just not always comfortable.  Be aware how your intention can have a hard impact.  He shared how their congregation has transformed over the past 15 years, 71/2 years a mainly liberal white congregation, then merged with a Pentecostal congregation which how they have existed in the past 7.5 years. On Sundays they offer 3 different services: humanist, tradition, and “Unicostal” service.  Lastly: Love the stranger, love the other – doesn’t mean liking.  In the spirit of Loving Beyond Belief – welcome all who welcome all.  You do not need to like or believe what others believe or like them to love them.
  18. As the Foothills world turns, as the Foothills pendulum swings….Our family was attracted in 2001 to our Foothills community in part because of its intellectual past and then-present humanist perspectives. It was good to touch base at GA in Portland with the UU Humanists. These past few years at Foothills have been a transition with some interesting, yet uncomfortable changes. And although I still identify as a religious humanist, I also welcome our more “heart,” and “spiritual” communications while expanding our concepts of theological diversity in our Foothills community. As my support for a free pulpit in UU churches sometimes contrasts with my wincing when our heavier holy language feels like “fingernails on a chalkboard,” I maintain that our close relationships and sense of community will help us work through a new normal. Hopefully, as our ministerial searches continue, we will seek people with complementary skills and abilities who can serve our diverse community within our available resources, while realizing that trying to do so is a particularly difficult job.
  19. The Power of Foothills connections with the regions and the UUA – The Portland GA was the second I have attended, following the Salt Lake City GA in 2009. As we attended sessions, met old friends and made new ones, the value of our wider UU relationships was reaffirmed. We can learn much from our fellow congregations and ministers about how to make progress in social justice work, running our church organizations well (also known as “church governance” – not a scary phrase, by the way!), and strengthening our relationships in our Foothills community, Northern Colorado and the wider world. The process of growing into our future can be eased by building those relationships and drawing on lessons learned by our new friends who have already navigated many of these issues. Yes We Can!Photo/Nancy PierceFrom a workshop on “Congregational Polity for a Beyond Congregations Age” – we have been congregational in polity much longer than we have been liberal in theology.  Polity is the way churches are connected to each other, sets of beliefs, doctrines, and structures that hold local churches together.  Spirituality can be practiced alone; religion cannot. People no longer feel being claimed is important – membership is going down. Joining and covenanting is like wedding and marriage.  Joining and wedding happens once.  Covenanting and marriage is continuous.  A community that accepts an individual act as connect is creating a community of isolation – people want to be connected, but membership is not the only way to do that.  How do we do that? With covenant.  With the larger UU movement.
  20. From a session on adult faith formation – we need opportunities every Sunday for seekers to “drop in” and learn about the culture of the church.
  21. From the session on domestic violence I was reminded that one in four women have been or will be in their lifetime the victim of physical or sexual violence. I was asked to change practices in my congregation as a result of this fact. I concluded that we need to train our pastoral care volunteers on how to recognize indicators of victimization and how to respond appropriately and that a sermon on  what it feels like for women or men to be controlled by men in their home or job would be very helpful and could reach a broader audience than the pastoral team can identify. We were reminded that domestic violence is present in all congregations.
  22. hqdefaultI was quite taken with the energy and flow of the worship sessions, the great music with joined singing by all near 5,000 of us.  Also how much black spirituals seem to speak to so many of us in words and music and emotions—so fitting for these times   Also the great sermon by Rev. Allison Miller on Sunday morning.
  23. From a session on engaging church members along a continuum of involvement comes the idea of having ten volunteers each take one church member to coffee each month, twelve each during a year. During this time the volunteer learns what the member is involved in at the church and what they want to do more of. This is not a pledge visit, but instead purely a time to get to know more members in a deeper way, to engage each member more and to thank them for their past involvement. This simple act helps the membership team, staff and ministers to better know 120 members each year while helping members to feel heard, appreciated and wanted.
  24. “Let phones be smart…  We need to be wise and strive for integrity.”  From the Ware Lecture by Cornell West.  I was so struck with it that I pulled out a pen and piece of paper to write it down.
  25. From a session on Classism:  We need to confront classism in our own congregations before we can accomplish true justice work outside our congregations, because so much of the justice work we identify includes some kind of classism.  Class is not just how much money you have in the bank.  It is related to education level, employment, income, speech, color, immigration, etc., etc., etc.  People “pass’ for middle class to fit in.  Just like we work to become Welcoming Congregations to the GLBTQI community, we need to work to understand and become welcoming to class differences.
  26. From a session on Planned Giving:  This is often the only opportunity a parishioner has to make a large (in their own terms) gift, and can strengthen the bond between the individual and the church.  If you want congregants to include this final donation in their estate plans, you have to educate them, ask them, keep in touch, and recognize those who do in advance.
  27. From the Ware Lecture: We need to be a “Blues” people – which means not turning away from the pain or suffering of the world, but responding to it with love and hope.
  28. I think Cornel West’s major points on decency, integrity, honesty and virtue are worthy of discussion and a sermon here at home.  I am reading his book Democracy Matters: Winning the Fight Against Imperialism.  I hope I can convince
    one of the book groups we belong to to read this book.
  29. I attended many of the climate change groups and was glad to see many other UUs ready to work and act on this most threatening of issues. And that it was one of the four actions issues chosen.
  30. Also several of the workshops gave focus to the corporate capitalist structure of power and control that we all live in, something many people UU or not, still feel uncomfortable about naming the elephant in the room.
  31. 150625_marlin_lavanharThe sermon from Marlin Lavanhar on Thursday night was maybe the most moving sermon I’ve ever heard from a Unitarian Universalist.  A few highlights: “most people… including most of us… (including me) are more afraid than we let on…If coming to church means putting on our Sunday face and hiding all of this from one another and presenting a façade of self-reliance (well, pardon me Mr. Emerson) but who wants to go to that church?”  “I’m willing to bet that most of us have something about ourselves that we would be scared to tell the people in our congregation… but that if we did tell and we found they still love and respect us, it would be incredibly healing for us and would free others to do the same. Now that sounds like a church I’d like to attend!” “But as I’ve begun to teach and preach from my mistakes, rather than always talking about my successes.”hile we’ve created a whole conference this year on the idea of discovering the “New Way”… I want to propose that it’s not a new way that we have to live into. It’s that we have to finally embody the fullness of the proposition which is the old way. We have yet to fully embrace the promise of our democratic, covenantal tradition.” YES YES YES

Ministerial Search Committee Begins Its Work

The newly elected Ministerial Search Committee has begun the process of finding the best possible Senior Minister for Foothills Unitarian Church.  We have made contact with the Rev. Amy Rowland, a UUA-trained facilitator, and will be meeting with her to schedule an organizational and team-building retreat.  This retreat has been identified as a very important first step for your Search Committee to become well acquainted and build a strong team.
We have also decided to make contact with Keith Kron, head of the UUA Transitions Office.  This office serves congregations by providing information, counsel, structure and resources in the search for a new minister.
Last, we recognize the importance of maintaining communications with the congregation during the search process and plan to provide regular communications like this.
Thank you,
Your Ministerial Search Committee